Fiver
|
Physical and Behavioral Circuit Modeling of the SP12 Samplerhttp://ccrma.stanford.edu/~dtyeh/sp12/yeh2007icmcsp12slides.pdf
Quote (page 8, Sound Examples): 'Physical modeling produces accurate results capturing much of the character of the real thing.'
The studies comparisons (sp12 vs matlab?):
http://ccrma.stanford.edu/~dtyeh/sp12/wavs/sound%20compare.htm
Practically identical imo. Pitty there are no 1-7 channel emulations. Food for thought though.
One day i'll own a real one, then i can stop fantasising over emulations! Got to be said this dude was on to something.
The article was written in response to John Nolting page here
http://ccrma.stanford.edu/~nolting/220c/
(relating to a previous post on these forums)
PEACE
Aiight, EDIT just found another article:
http://ccrma.stanford.edu/~dtyeh/papers/yeh07_icmc_sp12.pdf
|
thx
|
sp12really interesting
thanks for the articles
|
Fiver
|
Re: sp12 | thx wrote: | really interesting
thanks for the articles
 |
No worries man. What you reckon on the comparisons?
|
thx
|
Re: sp12 | Fiver wrote: | | thx wrote: | really interesting
thanks for the articles
 |
No worries man. What you reckon on the comparisons? |
i ain't got no sp12 (got the 1200), but it seems to be good articles anyway...
i still haven't read all
|
Fiver
|
The audio comparisons are impressive imho
|
Deck Daddy
|
I failed the test!
Even if the sound could be emulated with computers in the future, I would still rock the stand alone SP just for the workflow/interface. I love to work on a physical beat machine, and the SP1200 is fast + fun to me.
|
peterpiper0815
|
^^Thats why I hope someone will program a VST so all the people that are just after the sound won't bid on ebay anymore and there is a chance getting the 1200 for less money.
peace
|
|
|