Please Register and Login to this forum to stop seeing this advertsing.
|
|
![]()
|
|
|
DFACE DXA
admin
Joined: 25 Jan 2006
Posts: 955
Location: BRONX NYC |
so nobody over here has any reaction or comments to the sampler test?
_________________
 |
Mon Jun 22, 2009 4:54 pm |
|
|
Lotuz
SpUser
Joined: 16 Jun 2007
Posts: 80
Location: NL |
People here already know the Emax and SP don't sound exactly the same. People at the MPC forums on the other hand... 
Good work, guys. 
_________________
Intel Core 2 Quad Q8200 2.33 GHz 3 GB WinXP Home SP3 / Cubase 4 (4.5.2 Build 274) / Cubase 5 (5.0.1 Build 147) / Reason 2.5 (Build 312) / Creamware Luna (Scope 5.0.2603) / M-Audio Axiom 25 (4.2.0.3v4) / NI Maschine (1.1.0) / Behringer BCF2000 (V1.2.1.3) |
|
Mon Jun 22, 2009 5:08 pm |
|
|
DFACE DXA
admin
Joined: 25 Jan 2006
Posts: 955
Location: BRONX NYC |
haha
_________________
|
|
Mon Jun 22, 2009 7:11 pm |
|
|
leon freeze
SpUser
Joined: 22 Jun 2009
Posts: 28
|
New here/1st post..blah blah blah..Pickin up the convo from GS...the sound difference is stark. Seems like the Emax retains a lot more frequency range..but is not quite as knockin' as the SP. As an Emax user, I'm a little surprised. At the same relative sample rate it's def. not the same. Ay D...how did you normalize the sound files to be the same overall volume? And let me know about the test files when available...much appreciated. |
|
Mon Jun 22, 2009 10:35 pm |
|
|
DFACE DXA
admin
Joined: 25 Jan 2006
Posts: 955
Location: BRONX NYC |
i just gained the files til the peaks hit similar points and tried to make them as even as possible
i felt the same way that the emax has a more clear picture but the sp hits harder. also the way the machines alias is completley difference due to the alias filtering in the emax.
also so cats know i did that test with a emax hd rack and a sp12. the 12 has a higher sample rate than the 1200.
_________________
|
|
Tue Jun 23, 2009 12:05 am |
|
|
LogoS
SpUser
Joined: 19 Jun 2009
Posts: 11
Location: Cyprus |
sp definatly gives that BOOM-BAP sound hiphop producers are using... i think the emax gives a warmer sound though... |
|
Tue Jun 23, 2009 7:32 am |
|
|
thx
SpUser
Joined: 17 Nov 2008
Posts: 118
|
| DFACE DXA wrote: | | so nobody over here has any reaction or comments to the sampler test? |
really interesting... it seems that the sp12 sound harder when the sample is pitched/detuned. but also the emax sound is real good. i don't undeerstand properly what the antialias is supposed to do... it made the sound clearer? sorry for my ignorance and for my bad english
_________________
http://writers-connection.noblogs.org/ |
|
Tue Jun 23, 2009 6:23 pm |
|
|
DFACE DXA
admin
Joined: 25 Jan 2006
Posts: 955
Location: BRONX NYC |
it takes out the alias noise created from pitching the sample. this makes the sampler more flexible for doing like a multisample program kinda thing.
_________________
|
|
Tue Jun 23, 2009 6:53 pm |
|
|
loopwhole
SpUser
Joined: 26 May 2009
Posts: 112
|
ive been digin into my emax lately that thing is dope man! if they just couldve put a dope sequencer on there like the sp that shit wouldve been crushing the competition.
_________________
loopwhole.net |
|
Wed Jun 24, 2009 11:02 am |
|
|
DFACE DXA
admin
Joined: 25 Jan 2006
Posts: 955
Location: BRONX NYC |
it does alot to squash comp
scsi which is way more available than a 950 scsi upgrade. also beats the hell out of a dd drive
18.8 secs at 28khz
adjustable analog filters
emxp
that unfuckwitable e-mu sound
_________________
|
|
Wed Jun 24, 2009 1:13 pm |
|
|
leon freeze
SpUser
Joined: 22 Jun 2009
Posts: 28
|
| OK... |
 |
|
EDIT: Well..according to D the order of files was not the same as the video. I will repost the results of my findings when I work out the new file order. |
|
Wed Jun 24, 2009 11:02 pm |
|
|
RHYTHM MONSTER
SpUser
Joined: 22 Feb 2007
Posts: 290
|
Nice video showin cats the facts. |
|
Sat Jun 27, 2009 1:38 am |
|
|
rokuez
SpUser
Joined: 28 Feb 2006
Posts: 103
|
| RHYTHM MONSTER wrote: | | Nice video showin cats the facts. |
definitely !!
_________________
E-mu Emulator Sampler Series Forum
EIII EII EI & EIIIXP
www.eiiiforum.com |
|
Sat Jun 27, 2009 1:37 pm |
|
|
| |
